When AI Meets Academic Integrity: Chatgpt Use and Plagiarism Awareness in a Pesantren-Based University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57250/ajpp.v5i2.2910Kata Kunci:
ChatGPT, integritas akademik, kesadaran plagiarisme, pendidikan tinggi, universitas berbasis pesantrenAbstrak
Meningkatnya penggunaan alat kecerdasan buatan generatif seperti ChatGPT telah menimbulkan kekhawatiran terkait integritas akademik di pendidikan tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki hubungan antara penggunaan ChatGPT dalam pengerjaan tugas akademik dan kesadaran plagiarisme pada mahasiswa sarjana di sebuah universitas berbasis pesantren di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kuantitatif korelasional dengan pendekatan cross-sectional yang melibatkan 120 mahasiswa sarjana yang dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner self-report yang terdiri atas Skala Penggunaan ChatGPT dan Skala Kesadaran Plagiarisme. Analisis statistik deskriptif dan uji korelasi Spearman’s Rho dilakukan menggunakan IBM SPSS Statistics 31. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa memiliki tingkat penggunaan ChatGPT yang sedang (M = 31,80; SD = 6,59) serta tingkat kesadaran plagiarisme yang relatif tinggi (M = 39,12; SD = 6,47). Analisis korelasi menunjukkan tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara penggunaan ChatGPT dan kesadaran plagiarisme (r = 0,111; p = 0,229). Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa penggunaan ChatGPT tidak secara otomatis berkaitan dengan kesadaran etis mahasiswa terhadap plagiarisme. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya membedakan antara kesadaran plagiarisme dan perilaku yang berkaitan dengan plagiarisme, serta menunjukkan bahwa konteks institusional dan budaya dapat memengaruhi cara mahasiswa berinteraksi dengan teknologi AI. Institusi pendidikan sebaiknya berfokus pada penguatan pendidikan integritas akademik dan praktik penggunaan AI yang bertanggung jawab, daripada hanya mengandalkan pendekatan yang bersifat restriktif.
Unduhan
Referensi
Campo, L., Delgado, N., & Etxabe-Urbieta, J. M. (2025). Relationship between the use of ChatGPT and plagiarism in higher education: The influence of gender, age and previous academic results. Innovative Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09830-z
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, *61*(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fajt, B., & Schiller, E. (2025). ChatGPT in academia: University students' attitudes towards the use of ChatGPT and plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1363–1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09603-5
Galindo-Domínguez, H., Campo, L., Delgado, N., & de la Maza, M. S. (2025). Relationship between the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes and plagiarism: The influence of student-related variables on cheating behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, *33*(6), 4047–4061. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2457351
Goodwin, L. D., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Understanding correlation: Factors that affect the size of r. The Journal of Experimental Education, *74*(3), 249–266.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill.
Habiba, H., & Jaya, H. P. (2025). Correlation analysis: AI usage frequency in academic writing course and plagiarism awareness. Journal of English Language and Education, *10*(5), 481–490.
Haq, M. A., & Aziz, I. N. (2024). Digital translanguaging in teaching turath: Negotiating tradition and modernity at an Islamic university. JALIE: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Islamic Education, *4*(3), 1–18.
Huda, K. (2024). Analysis of teaching aids in teaching speaking to UNKAFA English language education students. JALIE: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Islamic Education, *8*(1), 97–110.
Jereb, E., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., & Šprajc, P. (2018). Gender differences in students' awareness of plagiarism. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, *15*(1), 1–15.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, *103*, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kovari, A. (2025). Ethical use of ChatGPT in education—Best practices to combat AI-induced plagiarism. Frontiers in Education, *9*, 1465703. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1465703
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, *11*(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press.
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, *6*(1), 342–363.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, *48*, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Farodis Salsabila, Khoirul Huda
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 